2 ms·
You can't blame people for voting on "party line" when there are only two parties to vote on. That's a problem we can't solve, so let's not shame folks for deal
by TheRealPomax 4y ago
You can't blame people for voting on "party line" when there are only two parties to vote on. That's a problem we can't solve, so let's not shame folks for dealing with it.
But here's the fun part: it doesn't matter who voted for the governor: once voted, the represent everyone in the state of New York, irrespective of who they voted for. When the house votes, almost unanimously to pass a bill, the governor's job is to sign it, not to stare at the wall picking their nose while checking their bank account on their phone every few minutes.
- ThunderSizzle 4y ago> When the house votes, almost unanimously to pass a bill, the governor's job is to sign it Which is why the pocket veto exists. If the governor doesn't sign it or veto it, it becomes law. 10 days is not a long time in the grand scheme of things, considering it took the legislature from Feb 2nd to Dec 16th to deliver it to the Governor - 317 days. If 10 days is that important, then we should be more concerned about the 317 days.
- TheRealPomax 4y agoNo, we should also be concerned about the 317 days, and the state should fire said governor for refusing to do their job.
- ThunderSizzle 4y agoI don't like the NY governor (for a whole list of reasons), but not signing a bill and pocket vetoing it - if that's wants she wants to do - is not her "refusing to do her job". It's fully defined as something she can do by their constitution. If you don't like that, campaign for a NY State constitutional amendment to reduce the time period of a pocket veto. You may want her to eagerly sign it - fine, vote against her in her primaries or the general election if it's that important to you. But her replacement will probably will also do something you don't like at some point. No one is ever 100% perfectly represented, especially by a governor or president.