Her legal case: > A sign says facial recognition is used as a security measure to ensure safety for guests and employees. Use of facial recognition is disclos

Her legal case: > A sign says facial recognition is used as a security measure to ensure safety for guests and employees. Use of facial recognition is disclosed with a reason for its purpose. They used the same technology for a different purpose without full disclosure. This is grounds for a violation, although civil. IANAL. However, she is going about this through another route. Liquor license does not allow them to eject people from service. MSG has a civil policy they will not allow anyone (including lawyers) associated in litigation to enter their venues. Obviously both policies contradict at this point. My opinion is no one should have any policy that allows lawyers of parties to a lawsuit to be hurt in any way.