I think it would be helpful in the comments to separate the issue of using facial recognition for public identification and entry, from the other issue of wheth

I think it would be helpful in the comments to separate the issue of using facial recognition for public identification and entry, from the other issue of whether this person should have been allowed in regardless of the policy. Personally I don't think facial recognition should be allowed for public identification. On the other hand, I think it's perfectly fine to bar opposing attorneys actively working against you from entering your business. This is not a member of the "general public" and wasn't denied entry based on identity characteristics. She was banned because she (her firm) is SUING THEM. That seems like a pretty good reason right there...