3 ms·

This is a bit too Luddite for my taste. Humans were involved at quite literally every step of this process. The human decided that this other group of humans is

This is a bit too Luddite for my taste. Humans were involved at quite literally every step of this process. The human decided that this other group of humans is not allowed on their property. The only thing interesting the computer did is tell security that someone not allowed to be there was there.

namaria 4y ago
Jumping to accusing me of wanting to revert technological progress by violence because I am worried about alienation caused by automatic rule enforcement is a bit much don't you think?
- Karunamon 4y ago
  The computer didn't kick someone out, the security people did.
  - namaria 4y ago
    As we get used to "the system flagged you" situations, people get step by step removed from recourse to unfair rulings. If I have to spell it out further for you, maybe you won't see a problem until you are personally affected. I understand, it's a fairly common posture.
    - Karunamon 4y ago
      So the slippery slope fallacy? The unfairness here came with selling someone a ticket to a venue they are prohibited from accessing. Solve that problem and the rest of the "unfairness" goes away. … And if you are incapable of responding to the argument without snarky running commentary, kindly refrain from replying.
      - namaria 4y ago
        Not quite. I'm not arguing that a small choice will inevitably lead to disaster. I have seen four decades of civil rights erosion due to some system or another (war on drugs! war on terror!) and now we are automating surveillance and enforcement. If you don't see the big picture, it's not my place to enlighten you. But oh the irony of butting into a conversation you don't like to complain about participating in it. lol