The reason was partly a blind desire for "safety" despite wolf attacks being exceedingly rare (2 fatal wolf attacks in the past century in north america). But m

The reason was partly a blind desire for "safety" despite wolf attacks being exceedingly rare (2 fatal wolf attacks in the past century in north america). But mostly it was due to commercial interests. It was to prop up an already unsustainable model of agricultural/textile production Wolves bring us biodiversity, keep diseases down, and even help rivers flow (by keeping graminivore populations down). We have way more to gain from them than to lose I feel like the anti-wolf side is much more akin to "anti-vax" than the pro-wolf side is. Either way its probably a bad comparison