> "Protected class" isn't very protected, as it leaves burden of proof to the victim Surely though, you understand and agree that having this law is better tha

> "Protected class" isn't very protected, as it leaves burden of proof to the victim Surely though, you understand and agree that having this law is better than the alternative, where employers ARE allowed to fire someone simply for being a member of a protected class, and are even welcome to brag about doing so.