> It's called reading the libraries documentation. You ever tried to read haskell's documentation? You search functions by their type signature. > Polyglot as

> It's called reading the libraries documentation. You ever tried to read haskell's documentation? You search functions by their type signature. > Polyglot as in multiple programming languages. lol ok. > I'm afraid it is true. Knowing the limitations of the tools you use is important. I agree. But to know the limitations one must know the tools first. > And you clearly do not. Having used both things gives me more knowledge than NOT having used both things. > I've done programing expensive networking hardware in C. I don't think expensiveness of the rig and skill correlates… are iphone developers better than android developers because iphones cost more? > I think you are missing that I know a lot more than you. Ah yes a "polyglot" who speaks just english. A true renaissance man. > If you think dynamic typing is like using void pointer in C you are very much mistaken. It's kinda-like-it, conceptually. I've written a compiler and an interpreter, I know how they work.