3 ms·
Which is pretty unfavourable for the world. Any other occupation isn't allowed to use their occupation to retaliate
by 8note 4y ago
Which is pretty unfavourable for the world.
Any other occupation isn't allowed to use their occupation to retaliate
- reaperducer 4y agoAny other occupation isn't allowed to use their occupation to retaliate Sure they do. It happens all the time. Politicians do it. Food service workers. Tradesmen. One place I worked pissed of a local plumber's union, and guess what — a week later the city condemned the sewer pipe leaving the building. Once we made up with the union, the city magically changed its mind.
- Pigalowda 4y agoShe’s not illegally “retaliating”. MSG wants to ban her so they must forfeit the liquor license. She is pointing out the rules of a license that MSG is violating. What’s wrong with that? MSG could forfeit it and keep her banned and all is square.
- pavon 4y agoIf the liquor license really limits who can be denied service, then I don't consider this to be retaliation. By analogy, if a lawyer is denied entry because they are black and they sue, that isn't retaliation it is just requiring the business to follow the law. If a lawyer is denied entry for some legitimate reason (say drunk and belligerent), and they dig up some other unrelated offense to sue about (while ignoring the hundreds of other establishments with the same minor offense), then that is retaliation.