3 ms·

Dislike has nothing to do with it. You’re suing my restaurant because you claim a patron of mine was over served by a bartender and subsequently killed someone

• crazygringo 4y ago
  Then tell your staff not to chat and not let anybody poke around. The lawyers may order food but not walk into the kitchen, just like literally every other customer. Frankly if you're running a public business then I don't care if you don't want lawyers there, the same as I don't care if you don't want people of another race there. If people are coming to eat and they're not being disruptive, then serve them, end of story. It's not your private home, it's a business open to the public.
• gwbas1c 4y ago
  > I do not want your lawyers or their investigators or staff coming in and chatting with my staff or poking around my business without my lawyer being there. Which was not the case here. You can not summary ban every employee of a large company that's doing something you don't like. Kelly Conlon is not involved in the case against MSG, and (as far as I understand) had no knowledge of the case.
  • LarryMullins 4y ago
    > You can not summary ban every employee of a large company that's doing something you don't like. Which laws forbid this?
    • kps 4y ago
      I am not a lawyer, but the article contains the assertion that state liquor licensing law forbids it.
      • LarryMullins 4y ago
        You're right, I was thinking generally, but the comment I responded to specifies "Which was not the case here."