3 ms·
Yes! Compliment the standard, don't obfuscate it even more. As someone who mostly write org rather than md, but sometime have to write md in various places, it
by erksa 4y ago
Yes! Compliment the standard, don't obfuscate it even more.
As someone who mostly write org rather than md, but sometime have to write md in various places, it's confusing that they're not all the same.
- encryptluks2 4y agoAgreed here too. This was a poor choice IMO. They call it canvas but it looks like a poor hybrid between mind mapping and UML. Markdown already supports hierarchy. I am guessing this let's you set coordinates for how to lay the canvas out but this is exactly why I'd never use it.
- alpaca128 4y agoYou say you agree but then state the opposite opinion? > I am guessing this let's you set coordinates for how to lay the canvas out but this is exactly why I'd never use it. You wouldn't like a text editor that automatically rearranges source code or sections of a document without you having a say in it, and for the same reason I find manual layout for this graph feature absolutely necessary. And beside that it's very likely you'd want some other metadata that just have no place in standard Markdown. Maybe a viable alternative would have been generating graphviz dot code and embedding it in Markdown code blocks, which would make it compatible with other tools as well - that could still be added via plugins.