4 ms·
'nonsexual nudity' Can the EFF not tell porn when they see it? Is softcore porn no longer porn?
by hobbitstan 4y ago
'nonsexual nudity'
Can the EFF not tell porn when they see it? Is softcore porn no longer porn?
- pksebben 4y agoone could make the argument that porn is in the eye of the beholder, here. not to mention, even if it is porn, who cares? are we such a nation of five year olds and nanny businesses that we can't be trusted with a titty?
- jfengel 4y agoWe're the nation that spends over $100 million dollars of federal money every year on abstinence-only sex education programs[1]. You still can't show titties on broadcast TV. So... the answer to your question is "yes". [1] https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/abstinence-only-programs https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/abstinence-only-progra...
- hulitu 4y agoNo. Only the supreme court can that. /s
- low_tech_love 4y agoThe fact that all instructors are actually models is obviously cringy, and that would certainly not be on youtube (although there are many similar channels with thinly dressed models) but to call it softcore porn is too much. It is arousing, but there is no simulated sex or anything evwn close to that.
- temporary22 4y agoPoses seem correct too, so even if they are models they know yoga too. Certain yoga poses are sensual even when you don't want to be sensual, I find the idea of naked yoga actually genius
- deterministic 4y agoPorn is legal in most countries. So what’s the problem?
- stevefan1999 4y agoWell, considering porn is opposed hard on religious ground and most countries are more or less influenced by religions, especially Islam who respond the most on it, not really.