Nothing that's said there is wrong per se but the writing is biased toward trying to sell the reader on buying their QA products and outsourcing. Which is fine

Nothing that's said there is wrong per se but the writing is biased toward trying to sell the reader on buying their QA products and outsourcing. Which is fine, it's their corporate blog, but just take it with a grain of salt. Personally I've lost count of the number of no-code QA tools over the past decades I've seen that fail to deliver on their promise of painless QA automation.