3 ms·

You missed the point. They're okay with the principle, AND they're okay with the technology, what they're NOT okay with is using the technology to microneedle

• pixl97 4y ago
  eh, kind of both. When you invent a hammer someone is going to use it to hit someone else over the head with it. It is an unavoidable foregone conclusion. Now, instead of a hammer in which society thinks they are useful and that anyone should have one, lets look at more controversial things like guns. In the US we tend to think everyone should have one, other countries tend to think the opposite, and are crime statistics reflect that. And I would hold the same is true when it comes to 'business crimes'. The US will likely uphold that businesses can use advanced technology against the general public, and countries in the EU will more than likely prevent businesses from discriminating with it. There is a reason we have laws regarding technologies. People will abuse them and the law is there to punish those who are abusers.