3 ms·
It's a corporation, which blurs the notion of what it means to be "private." To assert its rights as a private entity, the venue could restructure itself as a S
by analog31 4y ago
It's a corporation, which blurs the notion of what it means to be "private." To assert its rights as a private entity, the venue could restructure itself as a Sole Proprietorship or Partnership.
- dragonwriter 4y ago> It’s a corporation, which blurs the notion of what it means to be “private.” Legally, under established precedent, it does not, though a legal doctrine that as creations of the state through law corporations are bound by the same due process and equal protection rules that would affect all other state organs would be interesting, as would the corollary that foreign corporations, as creations of foreign states, are arms of their governments, and that their agents, including employees and domestic subsidiaries and their employees, are agents of foreign governments subject to all the rules and restrictions applicable thereto would be interesting.
- analog31 4y agoThere are aspects of corporate law, such as limitation of liability, that correspond to no natural rights of private individuals. In fact, that's probably the granddaddy of all entitlements.