3 ms·
Thanks, I might indeed! The one thing I really like about the Astropy system is that it's built on PEP-593 annotations and Numpy, The former being effectively
by nerdponx 4y ago
Thanks, I might indeed!
The one thing I really like about the Astropy system is that it's built on PEP-593 annotations and Numpy, The former being effectively free and transparent at runtime, and the latter being a nearly universal standard for numerical and scientific computing.
The docs also reminded me of the existence of Pint, which is yet another standalone unit system that I keep forgetting to try. Do you have some kind of comparison document among Astropy, Pint, and Unyt? It would be helpful to have a sense of how Unyt differs from the others, otherwise my default behavior is to go with whatever is the most popular.
- ngoldbaum 4y agoMaybe you'll find the paper I wrote describing unyt (https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.00809 https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.00809) useful? unyt doesn't have type annotations so if you need that then it's not a good fit.