4 ms·
The vast majority of people who own a single property (i.e. the vast majority of homeowners) don’t consider their houses as investments, since they can only rea
by MontyCarloHall 4y ago
The vast majority of people who own a single property (i.e. the vast majority of homeowners) don’t consider their houses as investments, since they can only realize liquid gains under very limited circumstances. Suppose you bought a $500k house and it appreciates to $1M. Unless your house appreciated faster than the overall local market or your are planning on downsizing/moving to a lower CoL area, all you can do is turn around and sell that $1M house to buy another comparable $1M house. That $500k of appreciation is completely illiquid.
While most people don’t particularly care about appreciation, nobody wants their housing value to fall because it could make them underwater on their mortgage, which in turn makes it impossible to move without paying out-of-pocket the delta between their house’s value and the remaining principal on the loan, which in the last housing crash was often hundreds of thousands of dollars.
At least in the US, where mortgage rates are fixed across the entirety of a 30 year loan, people buy houses mainly as a hedge against inflation, since your mortgage payment is constant across the entirety of the loan.
- tsukikage 4y ago> mainly as a hedge against inflation ...surely there's also the part where, at the end of the 30 years, you have a house, but at the end of 30 years of renting you have nothing.
- frankthedog 4y agoExcept the additional time in your life not having to worry about repairs, soliciting quotes from contractors, redoing things, etc. and in many markets like the Bay Area where renting is cheaper than owning you could have squirreled away a sizable and liquid nest egg. I say this as a homeowner, yeah the home equity is great but it’s not a pro without cons. Sure feels like I’m working for that equity while managing this house.