3 ms·
The point is that it's better than no having no solution. Not every kid is lying, not every kid is on its own. That we need a better solution, does not invalida
by PurpleRamen 4y ago
The point is that it's better than no having no solution. Not every kid is lying, not every kid is on its own. That we need a better solution, does not invalidate usage of the existing in the meantime.
- robswc 4y ago>The point is that it's better than no having no solution IMO, I just feel like it wastes too much time to justify itself. Hundreds of thousands of hours spent on a solution that relies entirely on the (unreliable) respondent.