3 ms·
> The claim that “accessible public transportation” can produce greater equality ignores the fact that mass transit, whether private or public, has generally be
by foepys 4y ago
> The claim that “accessible public transportation” can produce greater equality ignores the fact that mass transit, whether private or public, has generally been used mainly by an elite. In 2019, the median income of people who commuted by transit to work was significantly higher than the median income of people who commuted by any other method. More people who commuted by transit in 2019 earned over $65,000 a year than those who earned under $25,000.
Might have something to do with the fact that there is not much public transport in the US and most can be found in very large cities. Since city dwellers have a higher income on average this is not the least bit surprising.
The conclusion of the article is build on this argument and quickly falls apart in Europe. The argument not even true for the US because it is warped by cities like New York City.
- AuthorizedCust 4y ago> Might have something to do with the fact that there is not much public transport in the US and most can be found in very large cities Around the world, is there much public transit out of cities? And maybe public transit itself is a red herring. Maybe the right question would be on non-car transit?
- acdha 4y agoI can say that I've never had trouble traveling to rural areas outside of the U.S. - things like buses are widely used because cars and especially gas prices shift the tradeoffs.