4 ms·
I'm all for longetivity, but I admit what he said has substance. It's not (only) about old people having short term vision/not enough time for reeducation. 25
by yreg 4y ago
I'm all for longetivity, but I admit what he said has substance.
It's not (only) about old people having short term vision/not enough time for reeducation.
25 or 30 year old people are already very often set in stone and unable to change their views and they have most of their life ahead of them.
- scotty79 4y agoWhy not die at 30 then in the spirit of societal progress? This argument is philosophical i.e. worthless. We will actually have to win with death to answer the question if it's good or not. It's not something you can figure out without doing it.
- twiddling 4y agoWe could have blinking red lights in our palms for that occasion
- telotortium 4y agoRaising children (and later, grandchildren) is the obvious answer.
- scotty79 4y agoWhy not grand-grand-children? Current point looks like optimum, but it's really arbitrary and imposed only by external constraint of length of human life.
- toast0 4y agoWell, Elon is working on building tunnels and (maze) cars, I guess if Mars doesn't work out, we can have Logan's Run.