3 ms·

>slideshow Are you talking about inconsistent frame timing aka judder? 24 divides evenly into 120, so you shouldn’t have that problem on a 120hz tv anyway.

• satvikpendem 4y ago
  No, I'm talking about when a panning shot comes up, the video feels as if it's a slideshow due to how few frames there are with how much motion is occurring. Compare it to a video game where running at 120 FPS and moving the camera around looks much clearer than doing the same thing at 30 FPS or fewer. Note that I'm not even talking about input lag (aka the game feeling better at higher FPS), I'm talking only about how it visually looks on screen. I much prefer the higher FPS.
• kuschku 4y ago
  Even at native 24Hz, 24Hz motion looks so stuttery. Hell, even Avatar 2 at 48fps looked stuttery during action sequences. If motion is too fast for a given framerate, my mind immediately stops interpeting it and I stop being able to focus. I absolutely hate 24fps content with pans, because the moment there's a pan, I just see a blurry mess and it takes several seconds to readjust after the pan is over. It's annoying, it's distracting, and I hate it.
  • satvikpendem 4y ago
    > Hell, even Avatar 2 at 48fps looked stuttery during action sequences. Likely due to variable frame rate, I noticed this too. If they kept it at 48 FPS throughout, it probably wouldn't have been so stuttery, but they decided to make it randomly 24 FPS within the same scene which was almost unwatchable.
    • kuschku 4y ago
      But that's the interesting part: It shows that we only tolerate 24Hz because we're used to it, not because it's actually good!
      • satvikpendem 4y ago
        Exactly. That's why I want more HFR films and media.