>achieves 20-25 PSNR at around 200:1 compression, which is better than most lossy formats because that's in a quality/data-size that most image formats consider

>achieves 20-25 PSNR at around 200:1 compression, which is better than most lossy formats because that's in a quality/data-size that most image formats consider out of scope. according to https://cloudinary.com/blog/contemplating-codec-comparisons#speed_depends_on_quality_setting https://cloudinary.com/blog/contemplating-codec-comparisons#... google leaned hard on AVIF ability to produce small garbage in its comparison against jpeg xl