3 ms·
Well that's a strawman argument right there. Obviously by training I don't mean perfecting repetitive tasks or anything of that sort. If that was the case, I wo
by mrtksn 4y ago
Well that's a strawman argument right there. Obviously by training I don't mean perfecting repetitive tasks or anything of that sort. If that was the case, I would have advocating on training prompts or fast typing or something of that sort.
You can check my other replies in this thread to understand better.
- hosh 4y agoI said a lot more than that, namely that there are other notions of education than what you are describing: - That there is some outside agent that observes progress and "improves" someone - That such progress can be quantified, and comparable - That such measurement is the only way to acertain the truth of progress. - That there is such a thing as an universal standard by which someone needs to be educated - That the purpose of education is to produce productive members of society - That a person starts education as a "blank slate", ready to be filled by what the teacher is teaching - That the capacity to learn and the potential to be educated is fixed, and therefore, some should be selected for even further education - That learning only happens when there's an outside agent educating the person There are so many problematic things with this frame, even if it is fairly mainstream.