> Although, I am interested in knowing why you think that you are more qualified than these people to judge whether a discipline is scientific or not. Because

> Although, I am interested in knowing why you think that you are more qualified than these people to judge whether a discipline is scientific or not. Because this doesn't pass the smell test. You can always provide positive evidence for existence of something if you find a hole in provided evidence then you should then be extra careful believing the hypothesis. Or in Black Swan lingo skeptical empiricism.