> There is already a local media cache. I suppose I should have been clearer - apologies. I was talking about a cache for previews (which would presumably be

> There is already a local media cache. I suppose I should have been clearer - apologies. I was talking about a cache for previews (which would presumably be folded into the local media cache since it's already there.) > you still have a thundering herd when a popular person boosts a message Not if the boost includes the preview - that -should- cut it down significantly (and indeed it has been proposed but is still being bikeshedded by the Mastodon devs because "what if someone sends a fake preview?!?!?!?!")