3 ms·
I feel like people might read this (or just the headline) and take away a message like "aha, so for-profit fire companies actually worked just fine!" As far as
by turtledragonfly 4y ago
I feel like people might read this (or just the headline) and take away a message like "aha, so for-profit fire companies actually worked just fine!"
As far as I know, there are still plenty of examples of that model failing hideously in various ways (eg: [1][2], and many examples of unproductive competition from TFA itself). This article is specifically about firefighting in London, in a certain time period — notably starting after the Great Fire, when presumably those dangers were fresh in people's minds.
And also, to its credit, I think the article leaves the question pretty muddy and un-answered.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_Licinius_Crassus#Rise_to_power_and_wealth
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_M._Tweed#Early_career
- bee_rider 4y agoIt also ends with the fire brigades basically asking the city to take over because they couldn’t solve the free-rider problem, so anyone who thinks of it as an example of the free market system working clearly didn’t read far enough.