3 ms·
It is in theory possible to craft better-signed PDFs that would pass the European eIDAS Qualified Electronic Signature requirements. But in general the ASiC-E
by Avamander 4y ago
It is in theory possible to craft better-signed PDFs that would pass the European eIDAS Qualified Electronic Signature requirements.
But in general the ASiC-E container format is more versatile and also more robust against potential flaws.
- kjetil 4y agoIn practice, though, PAdES has a lot more support and has the crucial property of being easy to view by end-users. Is there any wide use of ASiC?
- Avamander 4y ago> In practice, though, PAdES has a lot more support and has the crucial property of being easy to view by end-users. For now, I'd expect ever increasing compliance with eIDAS in the future. PDFz are also not the only thing that people want to sign, that's where an agnostic container format has its benefits. > Is there any wide use of ASiC? I know that at least Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Finland have deployed it. Of those Estonia probably has the widest and longest use of it, as they migrated *to* ASiC-E, having used the predecessors BDOC and CDOC previously.