3 ms·
Would you mind explaining? As I understand it, signing works better if you rotate your keys regularly.
by sowbug 4y ago
Would you mind explaining? As I understand it, signing works better if you rotate your keys regularly.
- jgalt212 4y agoThe public key is publicly available so the signature can be verified. But when you rotate keys, what do you do? Post a list of formerly valid public keys? Are all public keys derived from one master/root key? And then you don't rotate the master? So then the rule is rotate "almost all" your keys. But then that rule goes out the window of master/root key is compromised.
- sowbug 4y agoThat's pretty much how it works, at least in GPG world. You generally never rotate the top-level certifying key, and you use that only for certifying. All that said, "that's how GPG does it" is usually a strong argument against a proposal.
- layer8 4y agoThere needs to be a time-dependent set of trust anchors, such as the European Trusted Lists standard. It’s not completely trivial, but the general architecture exists.