3 ms·
I would strongly recommend MyST. MyST extends Markdown for technical and scientific communication. See https://www.myst.tools/ https://www.myst.tools/
by runningmike 4y ago
I would strongly recommend MyST. MyST extends Markdown for technical and scientific communication. See https://www.myst.tools/ https://www.myst.tools/
- V1ndaar 4y agoGoing by the documentation it does it by... drumroll... converting to LaTeX! (edit: generating PDFs that is)
- periheli0n 4y agoTo be fair, there is no better free tool than LaTeX to typeset PDFs. But it fails at non-paginated, free-flowing content.
- abdullahkhalids 4y agoI tried MyST recently. All I see is a markup language that slowly become more and more complex over time to support more and more features that LaTeX already supports while at the same time acquiring the same syntax complexity of latex. What people don't acknowledge is that there is a base level of syntax complexity needed to produce fully general documents. If you do, the natural conclusion is that to fix latex, you need a full rewrite of latex with minor changes to fix all the inconsistencies that have crept into it.
- rowanc1 4y agoMy PhD written in MyST is here: https://phd.row1.ca/phd/introduction https://phd.row1.ca/phd/introduction Allows web-first, as well as a PDF output (via LaTeX).