31 ms·
The difference is that the insurance company was lying to the surgeons in order to exploit them for profit.
by reissbaker 15y ago
The difference is that the insurance company was lying to the surgeons in order to exploit them for profit.
- doyoulikeworms 15y agoIt's not entirely clear from the post. My interpretation was that the insurance company was making progress individually, but once all the surgeons started communicating freely, they realized that it would be in their best interest (more profit) if they colluded.