I think if we follow Hacker News Guidelines here: > Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easi

I think if we follow Hacker News Guidelines here: > Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith. We can reasonably take the comment along the lines of "even Murdoch didn't step in in this potentially harmful scenario." It doesn't necessarily hold him up as a paragon of impartiality overall.