4 ms·
You can usually find energy efficiency information for housing you purchase. You may not be able to find it for rental housing. Something like "mpg" will depen
by rsj_hn 4y ago
You can usually find energy efficiency information for housing you purchase. You may not be able to find it for rental housing.
Something like "mpg" will depend a lot on your lifestyle, how many family members, etc. It's not realistic. But what you could do is create a generic "score" -- which I think is what you really want -- that takes into account things like insulation and double pained windows, and then you can buy houses with higher scores. This was the idea behind LEED certification for office complexes, so I think you want something like that for residential housing. The good news is that this exists!
https://www.usgbc.org/leed/rating-systems/residential https://www.usgbc.org/leed/rating-systems/residential
So what I think you really want is to mandate that every residential construction project obtain a LEED rating -- or equivalent -- which of course will add to the cost of residential housing. That's a trickier question.
But seriously, we don't need more housing subsidies. Whether or not more regulation is needed is a quantitative question. Newer homes already have better insulation tech, for older homes, it depends on whether the owners upgraded them. If they did, you can be sure they will advertise this info in order to get more when they sell it.
Regulating disclosure of this for rental housing by landlords might be a good idea, though.
- Retric 4y agoCar MPG doesn’t account for the number of people in the car either, but the point is simply to be a consistent point of comparison. Having big stickers with annual costs on them at point of sale is just as much about influencing manufacturers as consumers. Think about the steady improvement in refrigerator efficiency, it’s not that everyone compares these numbers it’s that more people do. Someone being able to roughly find this out if they jump through some hoops isn’t particularly meaningful to the overall market. Someone building 1,000 homes however has to predict consumer behavior and looking obviously worst than the competition is never appealing.