From [0]: > The National Park service confirmed that P-22 was responsible for killing a chihuahua that was being walked in the Hollywood hills last month. No

From [0]: > The National Park service confirmed that P-22 was responsible for killing a chihuahua that was being walked in the Hollywood hills last month. No queationing humaneness aspect of putting to sleep, however was the decision connected to the attack? From what I've read: - P-22 was tracked and captured 5 days ago after confirming attacking a chihuahua in the Hollywood last month. - 5 days later P-22 was put to sleep Would P-22 be put to sleep if there was no recent attack on chihuahua? Does the obvious connection mean that the reason for putting to sleep was not "humaneness", but risk of attack on pets? 0 - https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63957074 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63957074