4 ms·

Because they took down dick pics? I assume you’re very mad at Russia too?

alvah 4y ago
Yeah dick pics are definitely all that was happening with the Hunter Biden / NY Post saga. Would you like to buy this bridge I have for sale?
- themitigating 4y ago
  Do you have any evidence or is this like the widespread election fraud lies?
  - alvah 4y ago
    Do I have any evidence? What, are you a policeman? If you truly believe it was just about dick pics, let’s sort out a price for that bridge. NFI why you’re on about election fraud, you’ll have to show me where I made any claims about that.
    - xcrunner529 4y ago
      I’ve found anyone that uses the “bridge to sell you” line doesn’t have any actual evidence for what they believe except it “feels right”.
      - alvah 4y ago
        Good for you. I haven’t seen any evidence for the “it was only dick pics, definitely nothing else” theory, I assume you have some?
        themitigating 4y ago
        So you want evidence to prove something didn't happen? How are you on Hackernews?
        alvah 4y ago
        If this is your level of understanding of logic, reason, and debate, how are you even able to tie your own shoelaces?
        themitigating 4y ago
        https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Proving-Non-Existence https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Proving...
        LawTalkingGuy 4y ago
        Normally you'd be right about how you can't prove something doesn't exist, but if you go up thread you'll see that xcrunner claimed that the laptop contained only dick-pics. It's fair for Alvah to ask for proof. Had xcrunner simply asked for proof the burden would be on Alvah to provide it, but because xcrunner made a claim he took the burden of proof on himself.
        xcrunner529 4y ago
        Excuse me? No I didn’t. I was never discussing the leaks. I was discussing what Twitter took down (aka what was reported to them).
LawTalkingGuy 4y ago
They conspired to hide a leak that they thought would tip the election. Not that the leak was only dick pics, but if dick pics were enough to tip the election wouldn't that still be a valid expression of voter will? > I assume you’re very mad at Russia too? But, but, whatabout the other guys! No, because I don't have a reason to trust Putin or the Russians, and neither do US citizens. But they do have a reason, and a right, to trust their elected officials.
- xcrunner529 4y ago
  The “twitter files” links has the Biden campaign reporting dick pics. We can actually view the links mentioned via the Internet Archive. Oops. And no they don’t have a right for something illegal (revenge porn, unconcent) and the company certainly has their own right to censor how they want and choose who they listen to. The Russian thing was about the actual facts about Russia’s involvement in the 2016 election and if you were crowing about that influence too.
  - LawTalkingGuy 4y ago
    Twitter blocked the NYPost and any DMs containing links to the article based on the set of advice you summarize as "reporting links to dick pics". The emails are probably the most politically relevant, and possibly damaging, as they contain possible evidence of corrupt dealing.
    - xcrunner529 4y ago
      Source? Be specific. I’ve only seen links reported that were dick pics.
      - LawTalkingGuy 4y ago
        Source that the FBI/Dems/etc only sent dick-pic links to be censored, or proof that the laptop leak contained more than dick pics? Earlier in this thread you made a claim that the leak was only dick pics, have you read a source which claimed that, or is it only that you haven't seen a source talk about anything else? There're these, many of which are verified: https://bidenlaptopemails.com/ https://bidenlaptopemails.com/ I don't know the entire contents but it is certainly more than just dick pics. I've heard someone discuss using the dates in those to corroborate other stories which means they aren't just salacious either.

Yeah dick pics are definitely all that was happening with the Hunter Biden / NY Post saga. Would you like to buy this bridge I have for sale?

themitigating 4y ago
Do you have any evidence or is this like the widespread election fraud lies?
- alvah 4y ago
  Do I have any evidence? What, are you a policeman? If you truly believe it was just about dick pics, let’s sort out a price for that bridge. NFI why you’re on about election fraud, you’ll have to show me where I made any claims about that.
  - xcrunner529 4y ago
    I’ve found anyone that uses the “bridge to sell you” line doesn’t have any actual evidence for what they believe except it “feels right”.
    - alvah 4y ago
      Good for you. I haven’t seen any evidence for the “it was only dick pics, definitely nothing else” theory, I assume you have some?
      - themitigating 4y ago
        So you want evidence to prove something didn't happen? How are you on Hackernews?
        alvah 4y ago
        If this is your level of understanding of logic, reason, and debate, how are you even able to tie your own shoelaces?
        themitigating 4y ago
        https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Proving-Non-Existence https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Proving...
        LawTalkingGuy 4y ago
        Normally you'd be right about how you can't prove something doesn't exist, but if you go up thread you'll see that xcrunner claimed that the laptop contained only dick-pics. It's fair for Alvah to ask for proof. Had xcrunner simply asked for proof the burden would be on Alvah to provide it, but because xcrunner made a claim he took the burden of proof on himself.
        xcrunner529 4y ago
        Excuse me? No I didn’t. I was never discussing the leaks. I was discussing what Twitter took down (aka what was reported to them).

LawTalkingGuy 4y ago

They conspired to hide a leak that they thought would tip the election. Not that the leak was only dick pics, but if dick pics were enough to tip the election wouldn't that still be a valid expression of voter will? > I assume you’re very mad at Russia too? But, but, whatabout the other guys! No, because I don't have a reason to trust Putin or the Russians, and neither do US citizens. But they do have a reason, and a right, to trust their elected officials.

xcrunner529 4y ago
The “twitter files” links has the Biden campaign reporting dick pics. We can actually view the links mentioned via the Internet Archive. Oops. And no they don’t have a right for something illegal (revenge porn, unconcent) and the company certainly has their own right to censor how they want and choose who they listen to. The Russian thing was about the actual facts about Russia’s involvement in the 2016 election and if you were crowing about that influence too.
- LawTalkingGuy 4y ago
  Twitter blocked the NYPost and any DMs containing links to the article based on the set of advice you summarize as "reporting links to dick pics". The emails are probably the most politically relevant, and possibly damaging, as they contain possible evidence of corrupt dealing.
  - xcrunner529 4y ago
    Source? Be specific. I’ve only seen links reported that were dick pics.
    - LawTalkingGuy 4y ago
      Source that the FBI/Dems/etc only sent dick-pic links to be censored, or proof that the laptop leak contained more than dick pics? Earlier in this thread you made a claim that the leak was only dick pics, have you read a source which claimed that, or is it only that you haven't seen a source talk about anything else? There're these, many of which are verified: https://bidenlaptopemails.com/ https://bidenlaptopemails.com/ I don't know the entire contents but it is certainly more than just dick pics. I've heard someone discuss using the dates in those to corroborate other stories which means they aren't just salacious either.