4 ms·
Sadly enough, I have the same issue with written content: BS websites add a ton of fluff to their texts as their deplorable approach to SEO and making some spac
by blauditore 4y ago
Sadly enough, I have the same issue with written content: BS websites add a ton of fluff to their texts as their deplorable approach to SEO and making some space for ads.
"Streaming your phone screen to a TV is something many people at some point want to do. But seeing the picture of your smartphone on a television or other device can be a daunting task. Here we list multiple ways how you can achieve the goal of sharing a mobile screen of an Android or an iOS device on a different device. It works for any manufacturer, like Samsung Smart TVs or Apple TV."
(goes on for another 15 paragrpahs before presenting a non-solution)
It's hard to put in words the amount of hate I feel for the authors of such pages. I'm desperately looking forward to the day Google comes up with better models for detecting useful content and those trash piles can burn in hell.
- thombat 4y agoOr Google has sorted the results by how many advert placement sites you'll have been exposed to on that page before it's predicted you'll stop reading, so having the paydirt right at the end looks great, and it doesn't matter if it's fool's gold.
- CamperBob2 4y agoSad thing is, the next generation of AI models is probably being trained on that type of content.
- j45 4y agoIt sucks because time on page plus how much you scroll and once you find your answer you don’t click on any more results signals to Google that you were satisfied. I’m just not convinced the preambles are needed.