4 ms·
> It's also a quite absurd for a free-speech platform to even have such a policy in the first place It does make sense for a paid-speech platform, though. Als
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 4y ago
> It's also a quite absurd for a free-speech platform to even have such a policy in the first place
It does make sense for a paid-speech platform, though.
Also, as a thought experiment, if Twitter were a part of the fediverse, wouldn’t this policy essentially be the same as defederating from the prohibited sites?
I’m new to the concept of the fediverse, so I welcome edification or enlightenment on that thought experiment.
- vgel 4y agoNo. If your instance defederates from another you can still link to it (though you might get banned if you link to something nasty, depending on your instance's rules). Defederating simply prevents your instance from automatically pulling posts from the other instance, aka the status quo for non-federated platforms.
- Klinky 4y ago>It does make sense for a paid-speech platform, though. What is a "paid-speech platform" exactly? Twitter is just going to be for press releases and advertisers now? It would also be absurd for a node that claims to implement free-speech absolutism to defederate from any particular node. It would also be absurd to stay federated with nodes that you claim are prohibited while telling people on your node to still cross-post content from these nodes.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- yellowapple 4y ago> Twitter is just going to be for press releases and advertisers now? It wasn't already?