4 ms·
> I would not have survived the last few years if I had characterized my impairments as being abnormal and negative. [..] Happy to answer any questions if you h
by pannSun 4y ago
> I would not have survived the last few years if I had characterized my impairments as being abnormal and negative. [..] Happy to answer any questions if you have ‘em!
Why not? I have several traits I consider abnormal, and some I consider negative (i.e. unlike the merely abnormal ones, I wish to overcome them. And some cannot be overcome but are very normal - e.g. mortality.) - why should that characterization impair my effort or desire to survive and thrive? Or rather, why does it impair yours?
> There’s an approach out there called the “social model” of disability where impairment is regarded as a neutral (neither good nor bad) experience and the good or bad experience is how the impairment changes interaction with society.
If I may speculate, is this the answer? You want to be seen as good and desirable by society, so if any of the multiple meanings of a word used to describe you carry negative implications, that results in a reduction of your self-worth? Even when a word is merely objective description, used without moral baggage, its mere proximity to alternate meanings taints it?
- ohCh6zos 4y agoAs a disabled person myself. It is both abnormal and negative. I don't care about any specific wording used to describe me beyond the ability to allow clear and succinct communication. A jerk is going to be a jerk regardless of the specific syllables used so why trip up well meaning people.
- onphonenow 4y agoIt’s interesting that so much focus is on getting people who are likely we’ll meaning but don’t keep up with the nuance. Heard someone called a bigot because they used the word Latina instead of the correct latinx. If you knew them you’d know they have family of diverse backgrounds so may not have even known the right word and likely didn’t mean “harm”
- kgwgk 4y agoLatinx can never be the right word.
- 908B64B197 4y ago>instead of the correct latinx It was my impression the word latinx was generally mocked by people it's supposed to represent.
- Ticklee 4y agoI believe the new in vogue term is "Latine"
- onphonenow 4y agoThanks that is helpful. Is this clearly accepted enough to correct native speakers for example when proofing copy?
- tsimionescu 4y agoThe correct name for a group of Latino people is Latinos, or Latinas if the whole group are known to be women.
- techdragon 4y agoHow is that any different than just saying “Latin” … I’m genuinely trying to think of how this might be pronounced, particularly with an eye towards American regional accents and yeah… it’s not great. Latine: - Lah-teen … rhymes white latrine - Lat-ein-e … normal “lat”, Germanic pronunciation of “ein”, like the number one or Einstein, “e” pronounced either “ee” or “eh” - Latin-e … latin-ee, rhymes with matinee, - lat-tine … lah-tine as in the tines of a fork. Or my favourite - Latin-e … just “latin” but spelled with a silent “e”. This is less than ideal… outside of using mispronunciation as a shibboleth, you normally want a group identifying word to be clearly identified and picked up by any possible group members regardless of if they have heard someone speak it. You want such words to be easily used by the people who identify with it, also crucially it’s self-adoption by the group that is being identified that matters… If no one you would call latine likes you calling them latine, or latinx, or Latino or Latina or Latin… you probably should just ask them what they want and call them that instead, that’s just my opinion from over in Australia where this particular identity/word fight appears to have mostly gone unnoticed against our own local issues.
- helloworld11 4y ago>used the word Latina instead of the correct latinx. It's not the "correct" term, and almost nobody I know of takes it seriously outside of really, really narrow little social media woke bubbles. If someone is a woman and of latin american origin, they will almost universally refer to themselves as latina and not care if others do. What idiotic nonsense to assume that something else is "correct" despite it going against the grain of a vast majority's word use. I live in Latin America and have latin american family of all kinds. This aside from many friendships of both sexes and variable gender identifications too.
- c0m 4y agoIn America, barely any (2%) of the Latino population identify with it, yet it gets pushed anyway. In fact, 40% are actively bothered by it. Forcing use of it is such a bizarre hill to die on. https://www.politico.com/f/?id=0000017d-81be-dee4-a5ff-efbe74ec0000 https://www.politico.com/f/?id=0000017d-81be-dee4-a5ff-efbe7...
- soundnote 4y agoIt's a tool of social positioning, and helps an academic precariat oust incumbents in fields where there really aren't a lot of positions and whose degrees are good for little but academia or being political commissars at organizations that actually do something useful.
- _5moz 4y agoI am also disabled and it's a farce to pretend that it isn't abnormal and negative. We're in the era of pretending we don't know things we know and its asinine. I really hope modernity survives this era of enforced stupidity.
- throwawaylinux 4y agoWestern society is reverting to one which bases consensus on feelings rather than reason.
- boppo1 4y agoJust in case you don't realize it, those of us who are not disabled are quite fond of people like you who are that are able to hold this viewpoint instead of insisting on the nu-speak.
- soundnote 4y agoCarlin's bit on soft language has, sadly, never been more relevant than today.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]