4 ms·
...or, just follow decent creators. No snark intended, but i just gave up with the dross. And even some of them, of late, are getting a bit crafty. But, creato
by InCityDreams 4y ago
...or, just follow decent creators.
No snark intended, but i just gave up with the dross. And even some of them, of late, are getting a bit crafty.
But, creators get one chance from me now - give me decent content, or even with the fancy chapters, you're not getting my eyeballs past two minutes.
What I have found is that leaving the decent stuff on, what auto-plays after is 'generally' of similar quality. A quick set of back-buttoning and bookmarking has fairly often got me some interesting results.
- neilv 4y agoGood idea, but I don't follow anyone on YouTube. I was thinking about searching the Web for a bit of info, the search hits include YouTube videos (but no finer resolution than "this entire video"). A search engine could, narrow in on the few sentences AV in the video that it thinks correspond to what I was searching for, and summarize that, and also link me to the AV start timepoint in case I also want to watch the video. This might change the economics of some YouTube video content creation.
- LelouBil 4y agoGoogle does exactly that, if a video shows up in the search results, it shows you only the relevant small part.
- neilv 4y agoI've never seen this before now, but I just got a Google search result video page with a kind of table-of-contents index on one of the video hits just now. (These TOC entries don't correspond to the marked segments on the timeline. I don't know whether this is something YouTube is doing, or something the content creator did.) Is this what you mean? (Pardon if I'm not familiar with the latest Google Search features; I've mostly been using DDG lately, so don't have occasion to see all the features that exhibit only occasionally.)