4 ms·

This will not end well as ml/dl has no intelligence, and given the ever changing world we live in, intelligence is needed for safe driving. Phoenix has less va

This will not end well as ml/dl has no intelligence, and given the ever changing world we live in, intelligence is needed for safe driving. Phoenix has less variation than many places, but statistics on the past won't help when something unexpected arises as it always will in time. My guess is they are only doing this now to convince investors (or google itself) that the technology is viable, when in fact, is simply is not. Best to just shut all these companies down until machine intelligence has been achieved rather than waste so many resources.

moeris 4y ago
> intelligence is needed for safe driving... won't get when something unexpected arises as it always will in time I don't think that's true. While unexpected situations do arise, I don't think people use much "intelligence" to handle them. When an elephant falls out of the semi truck in front of you, your response is to hit the breaks. You don't spend a minute thinking about the likelihood of the event, or question whether allowing the elephant to hit your car might improve the likelihood of it surviving (and whether that justifies sacrificing yourself.) The fact is that most accidents aren't very atypical. They're everyday things that happen, and people aren't paying attention, or they make a mistake. Handling just these scenarios will result in net saved lives. In other words, autonomous driving doesn't have to be perfect to be useful.