3 ms·
From a sociological & political perspective, I’m most concerned here by the expansive notion of “harm” embedded in these guidelines. Harm is a serious thing: I
by twoodfin 4y ago
From a sociological & political perspective, I’m most concerned here by the expansive notion of “harm” embedded in these guidelines.
Harm is a serious thing: It represents the line where my rights end at yours. If using an inappropriate but common cultural idiom harms someone as opposed to being simply rude, that has a potentially revolutionary significance.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- yucky 4y agoI think that's their goal though, right? The first step to controlling thought is controlling language.
- themodelplumber 4y ago> Harm is a serious thing: It represents the line where my rights end at yours. That's the only definition of harm you think is valid?
- Gigachad 4y agoI’d struggle to accept there is a reasonable definition of harm that includes using the word “brave” as harmful.
- oxfeed65261 4y agoTo be clear, TFA objects to “brave” as a noun, not as an adjective.
- barbariangrunge 4y ago"braving" in "braving a storm" uses "brave" as a (nominalized) noun