This stood out to me: > Then I gave an interview in March 2017 in which I said that a trans woman is a trans woman, (the larger point of which was to say that

This stood out to me: > Then I gave an interview in March 2017 in which I said that a trans woman is a trans woman, (the larger point of which was to say that we should be able to acknowledge difference while being fully inclusive, that in fact the whole premise of inclusiveness is difference.) It's not only about being inclusive of differences. For example someone who previously had psychological issues then learned to live a regular day-to-day life shouldn't be called out. Facts being facts doesn't justify blanket restatement. In most contexts if a particular difference shouldn't matter, then it doesn't need distinct identification. If it was a hot topic for the guest, perhaps the host was first to break trust.