3 ms·
It wouldn't, that's the point. The decision is about "if we accept as fact that there was no human element, then this doesn't get copyright". It explicitly does
by detaro 4y ago
It wouldn't, that's the point. The decision is about "if we accept as fact that there was no human element, then this doesn't get copyright". It explicitly does not consider the question if in fact there was a human involved and what that would mean.