3 ms·
I’m going to have to disagree with the core premise here. At face value, this article implies that if we all just live alone in the woods and hunt and grow our
by dionsaur84 4y ago
I’m going to have to disagree with the core premise here.
At face value, this article implies that if we all just live alone in the woods and hunt and grow our own food, that somehow we will be stronger as a people.
The irony here is that this is coming from a post made on the internet. The internet is comprised of a large network of servers and infrastructure that isn’t possible without relying heavily on the labour and creativity of lots of other people. Yes, that includes the work of people from other nations. We’re talking international, here. Imagine you couldn’t see a website hosted in Australia because some right wing politician arbitrarily decided that invisible borders should define our evolution as a species.
This post is literally self defeating by virtue of the mechanism in which it was messaged.
- analog31 4y agoAt a granular level, the earth can't produce enough food for all of us to live by subsistence, without technologies that require a relatively sophisticated society just to function. For example, more than half of the world's animal population is sustained by the Haber process.