3 ms·
I don't think that emacs need to cater to those with very shallow understanding [1] to survive. It has prospered for decades in its niche and I think it is perf
by gpderetta 4y ago
I don't think that emacs need to cater to those with very shallow understanding [1] to survive. It has prospered for decades in its niche and I think it is perfectly fine like this. The percentage of developers that use it might shrink, but the absolute numbers are very likely going up.
[1] mind, I don't think that emacs requires very deep understanding either, but I might be overestimating the average programmer.