3 ms·
Just a few says ago there was a thread where artists recreated Disney art with A.I. I simply cannot imagine a world, where this stance will stand. Sooner or lat
by weinzierl 4y ago
Just a few says ago there was a thread where artists recreated Disney art with A.I. I simply cannot imagine a world, where this stance will stand. Sooner or later we will see a massive crackdown by the large copyright holders.
- awb 4y agoWhat if a marketing team generates 100 candidate characters with AI for the next feature film, selects the best one and then writes an incredibly detailed brief for a human artist to reverse engineer the character. Could you then copyright the human generated art?
- jl6 4y agoA key litmus test: can an AI produce output that can substitute for a copyrighted work, to the extent that the commercial value of that copyrighted work is diminished? e.g. if a future hypothetical DALL-E-for-video can diffuse a mkv file containing something that plays very much like Star Wars, then surely possessing the model would be treated as possessing a copy of the movie.
- bbig 4y agoCurious how such a crackdown would even be enforced. Stable Diffusion is allowing artists to opt-out, so I guess that's a start?
- jacquesm 4y agoThe whole idea that the copyright holder needs to opt-out is seriously broken. Copyright is not 'opt-out'. Stable diffusion has set themselves up for trouble, this should have been opt-in.
- kolinko 4y agoThe current copyright is quite clear on this already, imho. Tools don't matter, what matters is how similar the output is to the original.