5 ms·

How exactly is he radicalized? Because he suspended 7 journalists for 12-24 hours for doxxing the flight with his kid on it?

dragontamer 4y ago
ElonJet pointed out where the flight was. The journalists simply pointed out that ElonJet was using public data from the FAA. So no, its not considered doxxing. All airplanes must be tracked, otherwise there's a chance that they'll crash into each other. If you don't like that, then maybe don't fly in a private jet all the time. Share your jet with others. Or God forbid, use a cheaper, more efficient, better-for-the-environment electric vehicle.
- hgdfhgdhgfdg 4y ago
  [dead]
  - dragontamer 4y ago
    The Journalists he banned were not named Jack Sweeney. Also, Jack Sweeney is just posting data from this webpage: https://www.adsbexchange.com/ https://www.adsbexchange.com/ Its not like Jack Sweeney actually has ABS-B detectors of his own. All airplanes in the USA are going to have to have their ABS-B transponders on, to prevent mid-air collisions. You must broadcast your location at all times. https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/technology/adsb https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/technology/adsb https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/technology/equipadsb/research/airspace https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/technology/equipadsb/researc...
  - Jotra7 4y ago
  - SilverBirch 4y ago
    You can track Elon’s flight from the tail number using the ADS-B system and the tail number is public information. You can find it all over photos all over the internet, even if you couldn’t you could just drive over to the airport, you can also verify it by checking the plane is registered to a company co-located at SpaceX. It’s all public information in about 200 different ways.
  - black3r 4y ago
    It's still public information. PIA only hides the tail number from ADS-B communication, but there is also ACARS, where it's not hidden. https://mastodon.social/@JxckS/109524638137254564 https://mastodon.social/@JxckS/109524638137254564 https://mastodon.social/@JxckS/109526625919858739 https://mastodon.social/@JxckS/109526625919858739
  - espadrine 4y ago
    > Jack Sweeney was posting non public information. I feel like the speculation going on in the discourse as to the mysterious ways that the tracking was able to perpetuate muddies the waters, so let’s make that clearer. 1. It is public information that SpaceX has a public address at 1 Rocket Road, Hawthorne[0]. 2. It is public information that a jet is registered at FAA for an owner whose shell company has a public address at 1 Rocket Road, Hawthorne. Its tail number is N628TS[1]. 3. The jet is required by law to broadcast publicly, unencrypted, its tail number. Hobbyist pilots and ATCs around the world exchange that information to keep track of what is in the air. That exact jet’s ACARS information contains both its tail number and ICAO address[2]. The PIA anonymization program can randomize the ICAO address, but here we find which one it is by going through all planes. There are just so few. 4. The jet is also required to broadcast ADS-B messages publicly. ADS-B contains the ICAO address and latitude / longitude / altitude / velocity[3]. [0]: https://www.spacex.com/media/privacy_policy_spacex.pdf https://www.spacex.com/media/privacy_policy_spacex.pdf [1]: https://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry/Search/NNumberResult?NNumberTxt=628TS https://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry/Search/NNumberResul... [2]: https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/109/526/620/916/116/105/original/8f4aec72e6646d1e.png https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/109/52... [3]: https://mode-s.org/decode/content/ads-b/1-basics.html https://mode-s.org/decode/content/ads-b/1-basics.html
- microtherion 4y ago
  The flight in question, by the way, occurred on Monday: https://www.facebook.com/ElonJet https://www.facebook.com/ElonJet And Musk is blaming it for an incident that he claims to have occurred on Tuesday: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1603190155107794944 https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1603190155107794944 An incident that was so serious that to this date, no crime report has been filed to the LAPD: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FkD6LcVWIAEr-cC?format=jpg&name=large https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FkD6LcVWIAEr-cC?format=jpg&name=... (and curiously, the reporter who first reported this fact was suspended from Twitter shortly thereafter).
black3r 4y ago
Even if we're calling it "doxxing", the only one who did the "doxxing" was Jack Sweeney, he banned journalists just for defending him. And it's been more than 24 hours since he said "Accounts who doxxed my location will have their suspension lifted now."[0], but elonjet and sweeney's main account are still suspended though... [0]: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1603982891179839488 https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1603982891179839488
concordDance 4y ago
No, mostly the increasing association and listening to more right wing people as the left wingers ostracise him.

dragontamer 4y ago

ElonJet pointed out where the flight was. The journalists simply pointed out that ElonJet was using public data from the FAA. So no, its not considered doxxing. All airplanes must be tracked, otherwise there's a chance that they'll crash into each other. If you don't like that, then maybe don't fly in a private jet all the time. Share your jet with others. Or God forbid, use a cheaper, more efficient, better-for-the-environment electric vehicle.

hgdfhgdhgfdg 4y ago
[dead]
- dragontamer 4y ago
  The Journalists he banned were not named Jack Sweeney. Also, Jack Sweeney is just posting data from this webpage: https://www.adsbexchange.com/ https://www.adsbexchange.com/ Its not like Jack Sweeney actually has ABS-B detectors of his own. All airplanes in the USA are going to have to have their ABS-B transponders on, to prevent mid-air collisions. You must broadcast your location at all times. https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/technology/adsb https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/technology/adsb https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/technology/equipadsb/research/airspace https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/technology/equipadsb/researc...
- Jotra7 4y ago
- SilverBirch 4y ago
  You can track Elon’s flight from the tail number using the ADS-B system and the tail number is public information. You can find it all over photos all over the internet, even if you couldn’t you could just drive over to the airport, you can also verify it by checking the plane is registered to a company co-located at SpaceX. It’s all public information in about 200 different ways.
- black3r 4y ago
  It's still public information. PIA only hides the tail number from ADS-B communication, but there is also ACARS, where it's not hidden. https://mastodon.social/@JxckS/109524638137254564 https://mastodon.social/@JxckS/109524638137254564 https://mastodon.social/@JxckS/109526625919858739 https://mastodon.social/@JxckS/109526625919858739
- espadrine 4y ago
  > Jack Sweeney was posting non public information. I feel like the speculation going on in the discourse as to the mysterious ways that the tracking was able to perpetuate muddies the waters, so let’s make that clearer. 1. It is public information that SpaceX has a public address at 1 Rocket Road, Hawthorne[0]. 2. It is public information that a jet is registered at FAA for an owner whose shell company has a public address at 1 Rocket Road, Hawthorne. Its tail number is N628TS[1]. 3. The jet is required by law to broadcast publicly, unencrypted, its tail number. Hobbyist pilots and ATCs around the world exchange that information to keep track of what is in the air. That exact jet’s ACARS information contains both its tail number and ICAO address[2]. The PIA anonymization program can randomize the ICAO address, but here we find which one it is by going through all planes. There are just so few. 4. The jet is also required to broadcast ADS-B messages publicly. ADS-B contains the ICAO address and latitude / longitude / altitude / velocity[3]. [0]: https://www.spacex.com/media/privacy_policy_spacex.pdf https://www.spacex.com/media/privacy_policy_spacex.pdf [1]: https://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry/Search/NNumberResult?NNumberTxt=628TS https://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry/Search/NNumberResul... [2]: https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/109/526/620/916/116/105/original/8f4aec72e6646d1e.png https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/109/52... [3]: https://mode-s.org/decode/content/ads-b/1-basics.html https://mode-s.org/decode/content/ads-b/1-basics.html
microtherion 4y ago
The flight in question, by the way, occurred on Monday: https://www.facebook.com/ElonJet https://www.facebook.com/ElonJet And Musk is blaming it for an incident that he claims to have occurred on Tuesday: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1603190155107794944 https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1603190155107794944 An incident that was so serious that to this date, no crime report has been filed to the LAPD: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FkD6LcVWIAEr-cC?format=jpg&name=large https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FkD6LcVWIAEr-cC?format=jpg&name=... (and curiously, the reporter who first reported this fact was suspended from Twitter shortly thereafter).

black3r 4y ago

Even if we're calling it "doxxing", the only one who did the "doxxing" was Jack Sweeney, he banned journalists just for defending him. And it's been more than 24 hours since he said "Accounts who doxxed my location will have their suspension lifted now."[0], but elonjet and sweeney's main account are still suspended though... [0]: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1603982891179839488 https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1603982891179839488

concordDance 4y ago

No, mostly the increasing association and listening to more right wing people as the left wingers ostracise him.