3 ms·
I wouldn't know. The person I replied to claimed that it was "private information of individuals". If it's public info by law then referring to it as private se
by wutwutwutwut 4y ago
I wouldn't know. The person I replied to claimed that it was "private information of individuals". If it's public info by law then referring to it as private seems very misleading, wouldn't you say?
- wizeman 4y ago> If it's public info by law then referring to it as private seems very misleading, wouldn't you say? But it's not public information by law. It's private information: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/technology/equipadsb/privacy https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/technology/equipadsb/privacy The aircraft tracking data itself is public, but what's not public is the information which links the temporary aircraft identifier to its owner when the owner is using that privacy program, which is the case for Elon: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1603803508087537665 https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1603803508087537665
- wutwutwutwut 4y agoDo you have a source which isn't Elon Musk? Using Musk as a source for claims in this seems a bit silly to me.
- blackfawn 4y agoThat source is a reply by Musk confirming a statement by another person (https://twitter.com/Timcast/status/1603748611896283137?s=20&t=P3gCl2LJJt2QjQRJbdBF4A https://twitter.com/Timcast/status/1603748611896283137?s=20&...) commenting about Musk being enrolled in the PIA program. That statement also has a link back to the creator of the tracker themselves also admitting Musk's plane(s) are/were in PIA but they figured out how to track it/them anyway.