I don't kow why you are (at the moment) downvoted. This publication is only PR from a university and as usual what the real scientific publication tells is ver

I don't kow why you are (at the moment) downvoted. This publication is only PR from a university and as usual what the real scientific publication tells is very different: - This univ PR seems to tell that even terminal stage patients may benefit from strong exercise: "Importantly, this exercise induced medicine occurs in patients with incurable, advanced cancer". Nothing in the Nature article tells something remotely close to that. - The scientific article [0] only tells that serum collected on those patients, when mixed *in vitro" with commercial cancerous cell lines, showed a reduction in cell growth. It's something that can be observed with a variety of means and it is certainly not a breakthrough. For example with propolis from honey bees [1], or Astralagus [2]. Yet nobody claims that propolis or astralagus cure cancer. [0] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41391-022-00624-4 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41391-022-00624-4 [1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36500338/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36500338/ [2] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36422536/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36422536/