6 ms·
Who was advocating for a proprietary monopoly? Not me. > I’m sure he’d be happy with any set of open archs dominating. But he wasn’t. He was advocating for hi
by klelatti 4y ago
Who was advocating for a proprietary monopoly? Not me.
> I’m sure he’d be happy with any set of open archs dominating.
But he wasn’t. He was advocating for his own single arch dominating which is quite different.
- dkjaudyeqooe 4y agoI don't think so. He has no stake in it besides having some input into its design, as he has for other RISC designs. It's Dave Patterson, the famous academic, not Larry Ellison.