3 ms·
90% or more would be fine as well, who needs proprietary monopiles? What's the benefit? Patterson is advocating for RV, but I'm sure he'd be happy with any set
by dkjaudyeqooe 4y ago
90% or more would be fine as well, who needs proprietary monopiles? What's the benefit? Patterson is advocating for RV, but I'm sure he'd be happy with any set of open archs dominating, which is the point.
- klelatti 4y agoWho was advocating for a proprietary monopoly? Not me. > I’m sure he’d be happy with any set of open archs dominating. But he wasn’t. He was advocating for his own single arch dominating which is quite different.
- dkjaudyeqooe 4y agoI don't think so. He has no stake in it besides having some input into its design, as he has for other RISC designs. It's Dave Patterson, the famous academic, not Larry Ellison.