>I have not much to say here. No, and yet you wrote this, which just begs the question what you think the issue is. Your issue seems to be one of equating rac

>I have not much to say here. No, and yet you wrote this, which just begs the question what you think the issue is. Your issue seems to be one of equating race with skin colour? Except you seem to be the one doing that. And in context I'm not sure what the issue is. I don't personally know the heritage of the current cabinet, but I can see their skin colour on TV. Therefore I can't comment on the racial diversity. I could comment on the colour diversity, unless you feel everyone should equate the 2, but then why raise the issue to start with?